![]() 05/23/2014 at 14:31 • Filed to: found on ebay | ![]() | ![]() |
eBay is going to !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! today.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 05/23/2014 at 14:33 |
|
I thought it looked kinda cool but the rear end killed it for me, that and the idea of paying 650k for such a thing.
![]() 05/23/2014 at 14:38 |
|
702 CID V12. . .
![]() 05/23/2014 at 14:40 |
|
Why the heck did they phone it in on the taillights? The rest of the car looks pretty good.
![]() 05/23/2014 at 14:41 |
|
Exactly!
V/12 - COMPELLING!
GMC V/12 - WAT?
![]() 05/23/2014 at 14:46 |
|
I had a feeling it was a GMC V12. I don't recall Bugatti ever building a V12(pre 1950s)
![]() 05/23/2014 at 14:59 |
|
Thunder V12 - an $18,000 boat anchor that makes 425hp at 4,200rpm and +600lb-ft of twist between 2k-3k rpm.
![]() 05/23/2014 at 15:53 |
|
If this was a Bentley it would be no big deal since old Bentley cars are the epitome of parts bin specials.
But a Bughatti? Wat.
It looks good...in a Thomas the Tank Engine sort of way.
![]() 05/23/2014 at 16:09 |
|
It was two GMC 351 V6's put together. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GMC_V6_en…
![]() 05/23/2014 at 16:09 |
|
Yes, I know. The "wat" was it's choice for use in this build.
![]() 05/23/2014 at 18:03 |
|
Honestly, as wild as it is, I think it's the perfect choice. They probably run similar to the original Bug engine, slow and smooth.